What Is a Follow on Agreement
Jurisdictions differ in their use of the term “agreement” in the designation of a legally enforceable contract. For example, the Washington Supreme Court has concluded that a treaty is a promise or set of promises protected by law, while an agreement is a manifestation of mutual consent that does not necessarily have legal implications. However, in Pennsylvania, an agreement has been defined as an enforceable contract in which the parties intend to enter into a binding agreement. However, the essential conditions of the agreement must be sufficiently secure to serve as a basis for determining the existence of a breach. It is a meeting of minds with a common intention and is done through offer and acceptance. A match can be shown by words, behavior and, in some cases, even silence. I swear the problem with many of these things is what they are called. At first glance, the term “follow-up” simply means “what we do next.” With a large weapon system, the final phase of life is usually maintenance and would fall under the dictionary definition of tracking, but is usually not the kind of work to be done as a follow-up to a “shrinking world”. A better term might be an “Intregral Completion” contract.
Agreements are often linked to contracts; However, “agreement” generally has a broader meaning than “contract”,” “negotiation” or “promise”. A contract is a form of agreement that requires additional elements, e.B. consideration. Typically, the contractor who performed the contract for the previous phase has knowledge and experience of the project or program that no other company has, which is in the interest of the government. Another contractor would have to work to catch up on follow-up, which would cost time and money and increase project or program costs, timing, or return risk. However, monitoring contracts may be awarded competitively or on the basis of exclusive purchases. Glad I got your answer. I thought I was going to put my 2 cents while I work on major weapon systems and tracking contracts. Read the full article at: smallgovcon.com/gaobidprotests/8a-program-follow-on-to-competitive-award-can-be-sole-sourced/ An agreement is a manifestation of the mutual consent of two or more people to each other. I do not think it is a follow-up contract.
You just explained why you need to use the OEM to get the job done. We don`t know what kind of crane it is (for example. B, crane, crawler crane, mobile crane, etc.), I was wondering how you discovered that only the manufacturer and not a dealer can overhaul the crane. In addition, any agreement to the agreement is unenforceable. In California, the distinction between a final agreement and an agreement to the agreement depends on the objective intent of the parties. When an agreement is in writing, the courts determine the intention of the parties by the clear meaning of the words in the instrument. Monitoring contracts are used when a project or program is executed in phases, and government contracts for each phase separately. Examples are systems development contracts, where the design phase is followed by the R&D phase, followed by the technical development phase, followed by the full development phase, and finally the production phase The contract for each subsequent phase is a “follow-up” of the contract for the previous phase. Tracking is “logical” in the sense that it continues something that was started under a previous contract or is a consequence of a previous contract. Maybe the J&A approver is asking a perfectly reasonable question.
Before approving the J&A, he or she wants to know if the non-competitive approach (single source with a certified dealer) is less expensive than a competitive approach. For me, it doesn`t matter if the proposed reprocessing contract is a follow-up contract or not, and it`s not worth discussing. We read in a post that the work had to be done by the OEM. Then we read in a later article that this would be done by a certified reseller. I`m glad the J&A approver didn`t sign if the original document didn`t answer his questions. Have you ever wondered about the differences between bridge and tracking contracts? Me too! In this YouTube video, we`ll show you what makes each type of contract unique and how the difference might affect your business. Check it out below or on our YouTube channel: “Tracking Contract” means a new non-competitive procurement awarded to an established contractor, either through a new separate contract or through an addendum to continue or expand a particular military program if such mediation was required by previous procurement decisions. One example is the award of a contract for the production of a large weapons system to the contractor who developed the system, if awarding it to another source would entail a significant double cost to the government, which should not be covered by competition.
Vern Edwards laid out the explanation of the sequel in post #3 as well as the true way forward in post #8. I thank everyone for the answers, and I have my answer. As I suspected, this is clearly not a follow-up contract. Can anyone tell me where I can find a definition of a follow-up contract? I know what they are, but I`m dealing with people who don`t know. I am preparing a justification with FAR 6.302-1 for the complete reprocessing of a crane. We`ve had this piece of Euipment for ten years. I quoted 6.302-1(a)(2). Whoever approves of the justification keeps telling me that I need to explain how procurement will eliminate significant duplication of costs or avoid unacceptable delays. I have already told them that the wording of paragraph 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii)&(iii) applies only to subsequent contracts; but he does not seem to register with them. I searched in several places and couldn`t find a definition. In criminal law, the sinister criminal offence of conspiracy requires an agreement to commit an illegal act.
An agreement in this context does not need to be explicit; On the contrary, a meeting of minds can be derived from the facts and circumstances of the case. It`s a shopkeeper who does the work. The dealer is also a factory-approved repair shop. The other problem is that the dealers have territorial agreements so no other dealers can come to the area and work. We contacted other dealers in the country and they continued to refer us to the local dealer. Our local dealer covers the entire southeastern United States. Anyway, the crane is a Manitowoc 2250 mounted on a pedestal. See Roberts and Dyer, The Role of Follow-on Contracts in Government-Sponsored Research and Development (MIT, July 1967) dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/48973/roleoffollowonco00robe.pdf?sequence=1.
However, you can never be quite sure what a person means when you use the term “follow-up contract” or “logical tracking,” so it`s always a good idea to ask for clarification. It would not be a follow-up. Why use a justification that makes you look stupid at best? I think you justified the only source in your response to my post. A contract 8 (a) was duly awarded to a company owned by Tribally on a single source basis, although the contract is the result of a competitive set-aside surcharge 8 (a). Follow-up agreements A follow-up agreement is an agreement that follows and relates to an agreement that has already been concluded. Vern, the way you explain it is the way I interpret it in FAR 6.320-1 (a) (2) (ii) & (iii). I think I`m going to have to break it down for them in simple terms. The way I see it; How can you have a tracking contract for a device that is ten years old, and something like this has never been done before? Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Isis biogen idec will provide Biogen Idec with notice of follow-up negotiation for each [*] pursuant to this Section 2.1.2 up to [*], unless Isis enters into a follow-up agreement with a third party in accordance with this Section 2.1.2 and the terms of such agreement do not allow Isis to grant Biogen Idec any rights with respect to the applicable tracking compound. If the merger with the Jackpot Companies does not take place and a follow-up agreement is subsequently entered into and a transaction constitutes a change of control subsequently takes place, the Company will extend to the executive the benefits of a provision contained in such an agreement that is similar to section 5.9 of the Merger Agreement. . .